University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Education at the HSC (Programs in Medicine :: Pharmacy :: Nursing) Patient Care at the HSC (Hospitals :: Clinics) Research at the HSC HSC Partnerships About the HSC (News Releases :: Calendars :: Administration) Library Health Sciences Center Home Page HSC Site Search ( Search :: Alphabetical Listings) HSC Home Page HSC Intranet  (Resources and News for Employees) University of New Mexico Home Page
Center for Injury Prevention, Research and Education, Pedestrian Safety Zone

The Department

Department Personnel

Programs

Rotation Electives

ED Scheduling

Committees

General Information

 
 
 
 
 
 

Center for Injury Prevention, Research and Education, Pedestrian Safety Zone

..PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ZONE..


Bibliography                                          PAGE  1   2   3   4   5   6


Research

Schwartz, WL; Porter, CD; Payne GC; Suhrbier, JH; Moe, PC; Wilkinson III, WL. “Guidebook to Methods to Estimate Non-Motorized Travel: Overview of Methods.” July, 1999. FHWA No. FWHA-RD-98-165.

In order to better address issues of traffic safety and to provide safe and convenient travel options for an entire population, the question of how many people use or will potentially use new or existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities is gaining both attention and importance. Planners and policy makers need to be convinced that the benefits of improvements are worth the costs.  Furthermore, these decision makers want to know where to spend limited resources to get the most “bang for the buck” as measured benefits to users.  Estimates of pedestrian and bicycle usage are necessary to plan for bicycle and pedestrian safety by developing exposure information for crash/safety models.  The Guidebook addresses non-motorized travel forecasting, including 11 different methods with descriptions, typical applications, advantages and disadvantages of each.  Examples of actual studies accompany each method’s description.  Included is some discussion about factors which affect travel mode selection, travel behavior, and route choice. Although principally a research design manual for planners, excellent methods for estimating types, volumes, and behaviors surrounding non-motorized travel are useful to both the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advocate.

FHWA Publication No. FHWA PD-92-041, The National Bicycling and Walking Case Study No.1: Reasons Why Bicycling and Walking Are and Are Not Being Used More Extensively as Travel Modes. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 1992.

Burden, Dan. “The Older Pedestrian: Special Problems and Needs.” Proceedings-10th Annual Pedestrian Conference. Boulder, CO: September 13-16, 1989, 217-221.Downtown Orlando Transportation Management Association.  Commuting in Downtown Orlando: Survey Results. Orlando, FL: 1991.

Dueker, Kenneth J.; Pendleton, Pete; and Luder, Pete. The Portland Mall Impact Study. Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration, December 1982.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fatal Accident Reporting System, 1999. Washington, DC: Us Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Cottington, E. and Jehle, D. Effect of alcohol consumption on outcome of pedestrian victims.  Annals of Emergency 1988; 17:53-956.

 FHWA Publication No. FHWA SA-90-005. Evaluation of Travel Demand Management Measures to Relieve Congestion.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, February, 1992.

Neumann, Cristopher. Matrorail Orange Line Bicycle / Pedestrian Access Study. Washington, D.C.: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, 1989.

Bentzen, B.L. Nolin, T.L., Easton, R.D. Detectable warning surfaces: Color, contrast, and reflectance. Washington: US Department of Transportation.  This laboratory study was conducted to determine the optimal physical properties of a detectable warning system and to study properties such as contrast, hue, and reflectance.


NEXT PAGE  1   2   3   4   5   6