University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Education at the HSC (Programs in Medicine :: Pharmacy :: Nursing) Patient Care at the HSC (Hospitals :: Clinics) Research at the HSC HSC Partnerships About the HSC (News Releases :: Calendars :: Administration) Library Health Sciences Center Home Page HSC Site Search ( Search :: Alphabetical Listings) HSC Home Page HSC Intranet  (Resources and News for Employees) University of New Mexico Home Page
Hispanic and Native American Center of Excellence -
 
UNM HSC School of Medicine

 

Strategic Learning and Study Strategies

 

Study Strategies

 

Explanation

Be strategic in developing learning skills

See Strategic Learning, next pages

 

Reading textbooks--preview, review.

Highlight text with markers--using different colors and scents

See Survey, Question, Read, Recall, Review (text review, p.19)

Be selective, take note of text headings, subheadings, bold and italic print, this shows what the author considered important.  Question while reading; What is this related to?  Why do I need to know this? Write notes and questions in margins when reading.  Read for understanding.  Highlight for outlining later.

 

Class notes

 

Use a notebook with a line down the center; on the right put class notes, on the left write your own questions and clarifications.

Take time to relate notes to text.  Rewrite and Review.

Compare your “important points” with those of other students.  Try writing notes, formulas, concepts, memorization material on “butcher paper” or “newsprint,” tape paper to walls and study it by walking around.  Highlight portions that become committed to memory.    Review, review, review!!

 

Create concept maps.  Use diagrams, charts, graphs

 

To illustrate important concepts in material, good for showing relationships between concepts.  Good visual connections.

(see Concept Mapping, p.30)

 

Note cards

 

Review often.  Good for memorization.  Make sure information is accurate!

 

Outline: text and class notes

 

Good for visual learners.  Use Roman numerals in an outline format, then review the outline.  Use highlighted text from text review.

 

Study as if you were teaching the lecture.

 

This focuses your study time and allows you to internalize new information sooner.

 

Prepare a list of test questions.

 

Can be used as study group review, or self review.  The learning process involved in preparing questions promotes thoughtful long-term learning.

 


Strategic Learning

I.       Steps to strategic learning:

 1. Set realistic learning goals.  These goals serve as the driving force “to generate and maintain the motivation, thoughts, and behaviors” * necessary to succeed. Set and use long-term occupational goals (you want to be a doctor) and short-term learning goals (you want to understand this new material).

2. Types of knowledge needed to be a strategic learner: 

·        Know yourself as a learner  (learning preferences, talents, best times of day to study, ability to match study skills to learning task); this knowledge helps you set realistic yet challenging learning goals.

·        Knowing the nature and requirements of different types of educational tasks.

·        Knowing a variety of study skills and learning strategies and how to use them.

·        Knowing the contexts in which what is being learned can be used now or in the future.

 3.  Use a variety of learning strategies:

·        manage your study environment,

·        coordinate study and learning activities,

·        keep your motivation for learning clear,

·        generate positive behaviors toward learning,

·        make new information meaningful to you,

·        organize and integrate new information with existing knowledge, or reorganize existing knowledge to fit the new understanding and information.

·        place new information in a present or future context:

·        How will it be used?

* Adapted from Weinstein, C.E. (1994) “Students at risk for academic failure: Learning to Learn classes,”
Prichard, K.W. (1994), p.376+

II.      Text Review:  A Strategic Reading for Understanding Method

Survey, Question, Read, Recall, Review:  The "foundation approach" also known as SQ3R is outlined below.  (O'Neil & Speilberger, 1979) 

A.        Survey--the text chapter by reading the headings, sub-headings, and boldface print; then based on this survey of the text...

B.         Develop questions--write out questions remaining concerning the text material. 

C.        Read the text—trying to answer the questions generated earlier.

D.        Recall the materials read with the book closed.

E.         Review the material with the book open. 

Study support strategies:

Both Primary and secondary support strategies are sometimes needed.  Primary strategies are those that you use to learn the material directly; support strategies are used to keep focused. 

A.      Strategies for comprehension and retention.  To help you reorganize, integrate, and elaborate the new material: 

q set the mood to study

q read for understanding by highlighting, marking important points

q recall material without referring to the text

q correct recall, amplifying material to digest

q expand knowledge by self-inquiry

q review mistakes (learn from tests)

q repeat , mentally process the same material more than once using active recall, also process the information by putting the material into an alternate form such as your own words, or another symbol system like concept maps.

* Adapted from O’Neil and Speilberger, 1979, p.3-12

 More on strategies for comprehension & retention…

Understand strategy:   

On first pass: mark spots you do not understand,

            On second pass: focus on marked areas you still don’t understand,

            Then,  

  1.   Identify why you don’t understand (words, sentences, paragraph)

  2.   Break the problem down into parts, look at the surrounding text for clues

  3.   Check other resources

 Recall strategies:

  1. After the initial reading:

  2.  Paraphrase and use imagery.  Periodically when reading re-phrase the new material and try to form mental pictures of the concepts.

  3.  Networking means transforming the material into concept maps, or “networks”; you organize important concepts and represent their interrelationships in a “network map.”  (see p.30, this handbook) You can use pre-set named links to code these relationships.  For example,the categories of: hierarchies (type) chains (lines of reasoning) clusters (characteristics, definitions)      

  4.   Identify key concepts, develop systematic definitions and elaborations of concepts, like the interrelationship between pairs of concepts.

Digest strategies.

Follow the strategies described in understanding section. 

Expand strategies. 

Go back to material and correct your understanding, expand on the recalled material, store important information, ask and answer specific questions in 3 categories:

  1. Imagine you could talk to the author, what questions would you ask? What criticisms would you raise?

  2. How can the material be applied?

  3. How could you make the material more understandable and interesting to other students?

Review strategy.  

Look at the effectiveness of your studying

Identify errors and determine underlying causes, so that you can modify study methods.

B.      Strategies for retrieval and utilization.

How to move all this new material into long-term memory so you can find it again.

 

Strategy

 

Explanation

 

Understand

 

the requirements of the task: use the comprehension-retention strategies focusing on test questions.  Paraphrase. Image. Use problem-solving techniques (break material down into parts and make connections).

 

 

Recall

 

main ideas relevant to the task requirement.  Look at retrieval process as problem-solving process.  What's the difference between your present state of knowledge and your goal state?  Set up reasonable sub-goals to get you there.

 

 

Detail

 

the main ideas with specifics, after recall of the main ideas, just fill in with details.

 

 

Expand

 

This phase organizes the information pulled together during recall

 and detail.

 

 

Review

 

Translate the information/material into your own prose

Schedule your periodic review: 24 hours, 7 days, 28 days later to make it part of your long-term memory. You must use information to retain it!

 

 

C.      Environmental Strategies to enhance learning:

 1.         Goal Setting and scheduling:  Set daily, weekly, and semester goals, you need to schedule time to study, review, and plan, especially long term projects. 

Use a workbook to set…

  •  career goals,

  • then skill-oriented sub-goals (that are prerequisite to reaching the career goals)

  • concrete goals for each semester and/or block, and

  • a weekly activity schedule.

 2.         Concentration management:  Two problem sources are attitude problems and problems coping with distractions

  • Attitude problems.  When setting the mood to study, learn to monitor your negative and positive self-talk along with the images created. Stop the negative self-talk spiral before it gains momentum. (see pgs. 38-39, this handbook) 

  • Follow your negative thoughts to their logical conclusion in an attempt to bring emotion in line with reality.  

  • Practice relaxation techniques.  In a relaxed state create mental images of yourself  successfully coping with the learning distractions, and replace the negative self-talk with more positive thoughts, and successful outcomes.

 3.         Use your learning issues:  From Scott Obenshain, M.D., UNM SOM Associate Dean, Undergraduate Medical Education.

  • List your questions and what you want to learn

  • Keep a running learning issues list like a "to do" list

  • Identify the depth and level of understanding you have of the learning issue

  • Review the list regularly to see how much progress you have made, it helps overcome any discouragement you may have.

 

III.    Elaboration techniques for learning:

Elaboration techniques are used to remember new material and commit the information to long-term memory.  There are several kinds of elaboration techniques, choose one that suits your needs.

Visual Elaboration:  Develop skill in forming visual images by highlighting new material, including concepts, facts and formulas, making sure: 

q         The image is clear, striking, vivid and detailed.

q         The image has real meaning.

q         The image has some activity, energy, movement, and interaction.

q         The image relates back to the main idea of the lesson.

q         The image shows how main concepts are related. 

Verbal Elaboration:  Connect new material to understanding and long-term memory by focusing more on language elements, using these triggers: 

q         Is this material related to something I already know?     

q         Relate the material to personal beliefs, values, experiences, attitudes.

q         Think about the implications of the material.

q         Compare and contrast parts of the material.

q         Invent stories or sentences, relate parts to other parts.

q         Connect information to the main idea.

Strategies:

q         Use analogies: What is this information like?

q         Use transformations, paraphrase the information in your own words.

q         Teach someone else the new material.

Organization Strategies:  Use whatever works in each learning situation.

q         Use outlining, highlighting, underlining.

q         Tree diagrams (or other representations).

q         Use charts, graphs.

q         Concept maps--use to relate concepts, especially relationships between concepts

q         Any kind of schematic to reflect the main idea.

 

IV.    Tips for specific learning situations:

 

Lecture

 Get the most out of class lectures:

 (Cotton, 1995, p.28-30)

  1. Read about the material ahead of time!!

  2. Look for an overview at the beginning of the lecture.  This will help you organize your thoughts and take better notes--which will assist with long-term retention of the new material.  Create a "concept map" (See page 30) of these major concepts to direct your note taking and review sessions. 

  3. Deductive framework: In these lectures the “general statement of law or principle” is presented at the beginning, and followed with the related and consequent sub-material.  The instructor provides the framework for the presentation of material.

  4. Inductive framework:  In these lectures the “general statement of law or principle” is presented last, after a series of statements leading toward the concluding general law.  Here, you must construct your own framework, this demands much more attentiveness on your part.  Using the classic scientific model, the lecturer proposes a link between discussed examples, and tests the suggestion with known facts and evidence, proposing a hypothesis, and works to determine if it is supported by evidence.  At the conclusion of a question/answer/discussion session, a general statement of law or principle is the concluding remark.

 

Discussion

 Get the most out of class discussion:

 (Prichard, 1994, p.103) 

1.         Read the text.  Prepare for class discussions. Try to make the text material relevant to you. 

2.         Preparation.  Find out what the discussion will cover in advance so you know what to look for in the readings. 

3.         Clarity of Purpose.  Try to stay focused on an identifiable problem or issue.  When reading course material, identify components of an argument while you have the original material in front of you; look for differing opinions.  Try to identify the values, beliefs, feelings associated with students'different perspectives. 

4.         Common Focus.  Bring books, handouts, outlines to class with you.  If the instructor prepares quotes, overheads, outlines, use this information to focus your ideas in class.  Materials the instructor brings to class are a clue to what he/she believes is important. 

5.         Refer to your text.  Use the textbooks and handouts as resources; refer to them often to clarify your thoughts and backup your arguments. 

6.         Summaries.  Watch for instructor summaries of discussions to validate what you think was said and organize your thoughts for further discussion. 

 

 

Lab Work

 Tips for successful completion of lab assignments:

 (Prichard, 1994, pp.157-163) 

1.         Use the scientific process skills of hypothesis formation, identification, and manipulation of experimental variables, and the process of inferring from data.

2.         You can learn to improve operational thought through “inquiry-based, hands on approaches” to laboratory investigation.  Begin with concrete examples and move toward the general abstract understanding of basic principles. 

3.         Rephrase the assignment.  Learn to rephrase the assignment in your own words to truly understand what is needed. 

4.         Look for meaningful patterns.   Learn to summarize data, look for patterns, infer from the data collected whether the hypothesis can be accepted or rejected;  and to identify extrapolation questions, such as generalizations, and implications.  What do the results really mean?

 

Experiential Learning

Experiential learning takes its thrust from the constructivist model which describes the learning process as one of constructing one’s own knowledge.  Through the process of active involvement in the learning process, you gain greater depth and usefulness of learning.  In other words, the knowledge is created by the learner.  In contrast, the didactic method can be characterized as the instructor imparting knowledge to the learner.  According to Prichard (1994, p.114), experiential learning: 

1.      Allows you to discover for yourself, gaining a sense of ownership and increasing the likelihood that you will actually use what you learn outside of class. 

2.      Creates awareness of the process of learning, which leads to the probability of lifelong   learning abilities. 

3.   Allows you to appreciate the contributions of all learning styles, as well as the learning dimensions of behavior, intellect, and feeling. 

  

 

Cooperative Learning/Study Groups

  

Characteristics of cooperative study groups:

 1.         Small study groups are self-selected.  

2.         It may be easier to learn difficult new material with others in a group situation. 

3.         Groups work especially well for test review. 

4.         The discovery method of learning depends on an integration of knowledge. The variety of backgrounds and learning styles inherent to group study can support this process.

5.         Students can quiz one another:

            A.  In what way does this information increase your ability to function?

B.  How does this new material relate to what you already know?

C.  How will this information impact your interaction with patients?

 

 

Some guidelines: 

  • Each person comes prepared--having read the text and outlined important points.
  • Each person prepares 15-20 quiz questions ahead of time.
  • Group study is best used as “drill time.”
  • Attend learning and study groups for clarification of subject content, and skills practice.
 

Small Group Tutorials

          Problem-based learning (PBL), as practiced in the medical school curriculum, grew out of a cognitive psychology framework with its emphasis on constructivist, student centered learning.  In cognitive psychology and PBL, instructional strategies integrate concepts such as linkage to prior knowledge, contextual learning, discussion and dialogue as learning tools, constructing learning, use of instructional scaffolding, and the primacy of metacognitive knowledge as a fundamental tool for lifelong self-regulated learning.

            Training in medicine has reached such a high level of complexity that an effective integrative strategy is necessary to ensure adequate coverage and deep learning in both basic science and clinical skill development.  Student-centered, problem-based learning is a teaching and learning strategy which has wide application due to its effectiveness in helping integrate complex primary data, learning of problem solving techniques for clinical practice, integrating medical science across disciplines in a systems understanding of medical functioning, as well as life-long independent learning skills.

             In tutorials, you will use a simulated or actual clinical case scenario, described in the context of medical practice, as a starting point for self-directed learning with small discussion groups.  Using adult learning theory as the framework, you are encouraged to follow these steps in a PBL session:  (Source: UNM Division of Education Development, 1997) 

1.      Given a written description of a clinical condition, identify the problem(s)

2.      Propose hypotheses to explain the condition identified. In this step, you recall prior knowledge, brainstorm or brainstream possible hypotheses to explain the clinical condition, question each other to clarify statements. Explain the mechanisms underlying the proposed hypotheses. 

3.   Explore what you already know, use it to make lists of questions that can't be answered at this       time for which self-directed study will be helpful.   

4.   Identify needed information such as clinical history, physical, lab and x-ray data. 

5.   During discussions you will identify learning issues.  These are areas of basic science, clinical         knowledge and medical procedures beyond your (the group’s) present understanding that will then        be researched, learned, and discussed in the group. All members of the group identify, prioritize,        and share the key learning issues for research, study and understanding.  These learning issues may        or may not be addressed in the next tutorial session. 

6.      New information brought forward through studying the learning issues is systematically applied to the clinical problem and discussed, through several cycles to arrive at an eventual conclusion to the particular case.  New learning issues emerge as information is discussed in the group.

 The faculty tutors guide you through this process, allowing group members to identify learning issues.  The tutor role includes maintenance of group cohesion and functioning, ensuring full group participation, focusing the discussion on important aspects of the clinical problem, answering technical questions to move the discussion along, and importantly, offering the scaffolding to move learning toward integration of important aspects of basic and clinical science that will explain the medical processes you study and answer the clinical questions emerging from the tutorial case study.

 For more information, refer to the print materials available in the Office of Cultural and Ethnic Programs (OCEP) student library, BMSB 106, and the office of Teacher and Education Development, BMSB B65. 

 

Concept Mapping:

            Concept mapping is a learning, organizing and review tool that emphasizes the relationship between concepts. This is important because medical knowledge and training draws from multiple sources, the different basic science disciplines, clinical practice, and communication. To fully appreciate this complexity inherent in medical training, clinical case studies are used to demonstrate the relationships between basic and clinical science. Concept maps can be used from the beginning of medical school to illustrate concepts and the relationships between concepts. This is an excellent way to purposefully "chunk" information and related concepts for more thorough understanding and for better long term memory and recall.

            Concept mapping and diagramming may be something you have already used; continuing this technique purposefully and consistently can also be helpful in medical school.  Maps can be constructed any way you like, using concepts and factual information important to you, with relationships between concepts drawn by you reflecting what is important to your thinking and learning style.

Making the maps or diagrams yourself necessitates a thought process that allows for in-depth learning, new information is more likely to move into your long-term memory, and will still be easier to retrieve in a more complete way later on.  

            Your map can be drawn with as much detail as suits your needs, from broad maps that outline major concepts to very detailed maps showing cause and effect relationships.  Newer, more complex subject areas may warrant several maps with varying degrees of specificity, where other, more familiar subjects can be adequately illustrated with less detail.  

 

Tips for constructing concept maps:

(Adapted from J. Pelley, 1997) 

  •  Select a topic

  • Identify the major concepts

  • Rank the concepts from general to specific

  • Start with the most general concept at the top, then spread out to supporting concepts with circles or squares     

  •  Show linked and/or causal relationships by connecting the appropriate concept circles or squares 

  • Elaborate by naming the kind of relationship between concepts on the connecting line, or using arrows to indicate direction of relationship                 

  •  Leave room to add detail over time.

For a more detailed explanation see Pelley, J.W. (1997) "Success Types for Medical Students."  Copies are available in the OCEP lending library, BMSB 106.  Also see "Introduction to your Psychological Type," by John W. Pelley, Ph.D., http://www.ttuhsc.edu/success/LSTIntro.htm.

 

 

Some clinical problem-solving orientation….

Semantic Qualifiers & "Semantically Competent Clinicians"*

Learn to use "semantic qualifiers":  This involves learning to use precise quantifiable language in the clinical setting to communicate patient information. For example, instead of  "pain in the right knee" you would use "mono-articular" pain and instead of "pain in joints" you would use "poly-articular" pain, and for "both knees" you would use "bilateral."

Semantic qualifiers are "qualitative abstractions of the signs and symptoms of a case in which an opposing abstraction is either explicit or implicit." 

The idea is to develop skill in clarifying and quantifying patient symptoms in order to develop better diagnostic skill.  Use of specific terminology that distinguishes symptoms helps to clearly represent the clinical situation in your mind, allowing for clear communication of those representations during clinical case presentation.  (Bordage, 2002)

Example 1:  "pain over the last two months" could be described as gradual onset (vs. sudden onset)

Example 2:  "the pain is in my second and fourth fingers on both hands" might be characterized as pain that is symmetrical (vs. asymmetrical) in the MCP and PIP joints, mostly small joints (vs. large).  (Bordage, 2002)

Example 3:  "Mr. Clark, a 35-yr nurse, previously in good health presented with a first, acute episode of severe (7/10), right-sided low back pain of recent onset (24 hrs) constant and sharp, that occurred on exertion immediately after lifting a patient from bed.  The pain radiates below the knee, to the right lateral part of the leg, the medial part of the foot, and to the great toe."*

The underlined descriptors noted above are focused, show transformations, follow the (clinical) reasoning, and use comparing and contrasting. 

Semantic qualifiers are distinguished by these characteristics:  (see examples below)

  • They are more abstract

  • They have built-in oppositions

  • They are used to build problem representation

  • They are a means to access and compare and contrast relevant diagnoses

 Some examples of semantic qualifiers:  (Connell, et al, 1998) 

Patient Characteristics

Male

Female

 

Tall

Short

 

 

 

Chronology

Acute

Chronic

 

Immediate, spontaneous

Delayed, postponed

 

New, first time, initial

Second, third, relapse, recurrence, flare up

 

Morning

Evening

 

Sudden, abrupt

Gradual, progressive

 

 

 

Location

Anterior (site)

Posterior (site)

 

Facial

Truncular

 

Intra, within

Extra, outside

 

 

 

Quality

Active

Passive, latent

 

Apparent, visible

Insidious, invisible

 

Burning

Crushing

 

Full

Empty, hollow

 

Greasy

Dry

* Adapted from G. Bordage, M.D., Ph.D., Professor & Director Graduate Studies, Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago. "Are semantically competent clinicians born or made?" Presentation- Ottawa Conference, July 2002, and

Connell, et al (1998) Assessing Clinicians' Quality of Thinking and Semantic Competence: A training manual, for researchers and medical educators, University of Illinois at Chicago, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago.

 

 


Contact the Hispanic and Native American Center of Excellence
University of New Mexico School of Medicine
(505) 272-1419

Comments about us.