Department of Pathology : UNM School of Medicine

Emerging Viruses Research Center

Hantavirus Reference Laboratory




Lab Home
Lab History
Diagnostic Testing
Genetic Vaccine Trials Center
Molecular Epidemiology
Prevention of Hantavirus Infection
Sevilleta Transmission Studies


Emerging Viruses Research Center
BMSB 337
University of New Mexico
School of Medicine
915 Camino de Salud NE
Albuquerque, NM
87131-5301

Phone: (505) 272-5837

Lab History

When hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS, formerly known as hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, or HPS) struck without warning in the summer of 1993, the University of New Mexico Hospital was faced with a sudden onslaught of patients with symptoms compatible with early HCPS. Our phone lines were bombarded with inquiries from physicians from the most heavily affected area (the Four Corners region of northwestern New Mexico). The answers we could provide were extremely limited, because the disease had never before been described. At that time there was no specific diagnostic test; antibody tests using reagents derived from distantly related hantaviruses were available from the CDC, but the these insensitive tests took 3 weeks or more to be reported. Unfortunately, that was long after the patient had died or recovered. The clinical syndrome was at that time poorly defined, making identification of HCPS patients difficult on clinical grounds alone. Furthermore, at that time it was unknown whether the newly identified Four Corners virus (now "Sin Nombre" virus, SNV) might be transmissible to workers in the hospital, laboratory, or autopsy suite. (In retrospect, we now know that those fears were probably unfounded.)

The University Hospital was in urgent need of rapid diagnostic tests for the new virus. Initially, we collaborated with the CDC to show that the peripheral blood mononuclear cells and blood clots of HCPS patients contained viral RNA, at least in the days of acute illness (ref) Thus a reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) test for infection was available by late July 1993. However, a serological test was greatly preferred. For this reason, we cloned and expressed all of the antigens of SNV in the bacterium E. coli, and used these expressed proteins to identify the diagnostic epitopes of the viral core and envelope antigens (ref, ref, ref, ref). A serologic test based upon the expressed N and G1 antigens was available by the end of August 1993. This test was made available to the people of New Mexico and other affected areas in October 1993 (ref, ref).

Since 1993, our laboratory has become a reference laboratory for hantavirus diagnosis worldwide. In the course of our referral work we have discovered a number of new hantaviruses in the Americas, including pathogens such as New York virus and Rio Mamoré virus (essentially the same as Laguna Negra virus), the first known South American hantavirus. Through recombinant DNA technology we have developed specific serological tests for pathogens such as SNV/NYV, Bayou virus, Andes virus, Puumala virus, Seoul virus, and Hantaan virus.

Currently available tests include:

  1. Strip Immunoblot Assay. This is a rapid "dipstick"-like test that measures the presence of anti-hantavirus antibodies. It is geared toward SNV, but incorporates antigens of Puumala virus and Seoul virus as well. Although it is an IgG test, it has been 100% sensitive at detecting SNV infection in patients at their earliest stage of clinical illness. Acute SNV infection can be distinguished from past SNV exposure through the reactivity to the SNV G1 antigen in the former. (ref
  2. Western blot assay. Both IgG and IgM formats are available for detection of antibodies to SNV/NYV, Seoul virus, Puumala virus, Hantaan virus, Bayou/Black Creek Canal virus, Prospect Hill virus, Muleshoe virus, Andes virus, and Rio Mamoré/Laguna Negra virus. ( ref)
  3. RT-PCR assay. Primers are available for all of the known pathogenic and non-pathogenic hantaviruses. Nested RT-PCR can be combined with sequencing to precisely identify the site of infection for patients with more than one possible exposure site (see the Molecular Epidemiology section). Either frozen, unfixed autopsy tissues of patients or blood (anticoagulated with EDTA, or blood clot can be used as the template. (ref)
  4. Immunohistochemistry. We prepared high-titer rabbit anti-SNV antibodies and Dr. Richard Feddersen of the University of New Mexico established a sensitive IHC test using these reagents. Using a 1:10,000 dilution of rabbit serum, Dr. Feddersen can detect hantavirus infection in 100% of North American and South American HCPS case-patients. This test is generally used on paraffin-embedded tissue sections obtained at autopsy. A thin slice of the tissue (lung, kidney, liver, heart, etc.) is covered with the rabbit anti-hantavirus serum, and reagents are later applied that detect the bound rabbit antibody. Positive staining is generally confined to endothelial cells, although some samples demonstrate histiocyte (macrophage) staining as well. (WB Green et al., Journal of Infectious Diseases 1998 (in press))
  5. Viral isolation. Since its sensitivity is extremely limited, this method not useful in hantavirus diagnosis. In vitro isolation of hantaviruses is helpful as a research tool. Hantaviruses can be experimentally passed through laboratory rodents, and will also grow on cell culture (e.g. Vero E6 cells) in the laboratory. Strict containment (biosafety level 3) is necessary to protect workers from accidental infection for cell culture experiments, and level 4 containment is necessary for the maintenance of infected, living rodents.